Sunday, 14 September 2008 11:14

Evaluation of the Learning Theory of Attachment

Written by Keiron Walsh
Rate this item
(0 votes)
On the positive side, the learning theory of attachment seems a plausible explanation of both how babies become attached to their caregivers and how caregivers bond with their children. It makes intuitive sense that babies will come to like those who feed them because they derive pleasure from feeding. Nevertheless, there is evidence that children develop attachments with people who do not feed them and that feeding is less important in the development of attachments than other behaviours.


Schaffer and Emerson (1964) studied 60 infants from birth at intervals of four weeks. The mother reported on the child’s behaviour in a number of situations, such as, when the infant was left alone, with the babysitter or put to be

Schaffer and Emerson were interested in the child's protestations at the departure of their caregivers:

  • Did the infant protest when the person left?
  • How much did the infant protest?
  • Whose departure resulted in protest?

It was found that infants were often attached to people who did not perform caretaking activities like feeding, bathing and changing nappies. Moreover, the primary attachment was often the father, sometimes the attachment was of equal strength for both parents (see table). What did seem to be important, however, was the quality of interactions that caregivers have with the child. Babies formed stronger attachments with caregivers who were sensitive and responsive to their needs.

Harry Harlow's (1958) famous experiment with rhesus monkeys also poses problems for the learning theory explanation of attachment. Harlow had previously carried out many studies on rhesus monkeys and, for the purpose of these experiments, had separated them from their mothers and had fed them using tiny bottles. Harlow noticed that the monkeys became very attached to the cloth pads (folded towelling nappies) used to cover the floors of their cages; the monkeys often had violent tantrums when the cloths were removed for sanitary purposes.


Harlow decided to carry out a study whereby separated baby monkeys would have the opportunity to choose between a surrogate wire monkey that provides food and one which provides comfort, but no food. The video clip below shows what he found

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video



References


Dollard J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gewirtz, J. L. (1961). A learning analysis of the effects of normal stimulation privation and deprivation on the acquisition of social motivation and attachment. In B. M. Foss ( Ed. ), Determinants of infant behaviour. London: Methuen; New York: Wiley, pp. 213-290.

Harlow, H. (1958) The Nature of Love. American Psychologist, 13, 673-685

Last modified on Thursday, 07 January 2010 11:27

Add comment


Keiron Walsh

Keiron Walsh

If you have any tips, suggestions or would like to contribute to the site, email me at this address.

Website: alevelpsychology.co.uk E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it